| 1 |
On 2011.08.04 21:06, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 21:42 Wed 03 Aug , Roy Bamford wrote: |
| 3 |
> > No problem - something as radical as that might have stirred more |
| 4 |
> > interest. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> And we'd hate to have people actually interested in this. =) |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> FWIW, I'd like to see us have 3 people at most on the council. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> But regardless of how many people there are, I think they should be |
| 11 |
> unequal with different areas of responsibility, independent |
| 12 |
> decision-making authority, and only one person at the top to revert |
| 13 |
> their decisions. I don't really like how all members are at-large. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> -- |
| 16 |
> Thanks, |
| 17 |
> Donnie |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Donnie Berkholz |
| 20 |
> Council Member / Sr. Developer |
| 21 |
> Gentoo Linux |
| 22 |
> Blog: http://dberkholz.com |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
A smaller committee for a chief technical officer fits better into a |
| 26 |
normal corporate structure. A smaller council could form special |
| 27 |
interest groups to address individual problems so nothing would be lost |
| 28 |
from the reduced numbers. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Regards, |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Roy Bamford |
| 34 |
(Neddyseagoon) a member of |
| 35 |
gentoo-ops |
| 36 |
forum-mods |
| 37 |
trustees |
Archives