1 |
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Matthias Maier <tamiko@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> This discussion is getting absurd. |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Centralizing the documentation (i.e. moving to the wiki in this place) |
6 |
> makes a lot of sense. If we loose some of the former layouts for a |
7 |
> moment, then that's the way it is. |
8 |
> |
9 |
|
10 |
++ |
11 |
|
12 |
If necessary it could be stuck on the council agenda, but I'd be |
13 |
shocked if the vote wasn't 7-0 to let it move it to the wiki with |
14 |
whatever compromises are necessary to make it happen (this isn't |
15 |
nearly as controversial as dropping changelogs when we move to git). |
16 |
I'd suggest just moving forward - if anybody wants to force a council |
17 |
vote they can stick it on the next agenda. |
18 |
|
19 |
I'm all for having versions of the handbook available in any format |
20 |
that people are willing to provide, including a hardcover tabletop |
21 |
edition with glossy pages and a bronze Larry the Cow on the cover. I |
22 |
just think that the onus is on those who want such things to provide |
23 |
them. |