1 |
On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 12:13 AM Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@g.o> |
2 |
wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Saturday, December 15, 2018 8:40:38 PM PST Matt Turner wrote: |
5 |
> > On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:16 PM Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
> > > - Disk usage for git vs rsync |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > This is why I have not switched. With git you pull down increasing |
9 |
> > amounts of history, whereas with rsync the data fits easily in a <1GB |
10 |
> > partition. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Recent portage can use sync-depth = 1 |
13 |
> repo dir no longer grows as it used to and it's works fine unlike initial |
14 |
> implementation that was giving trouble |
15 |
> |
16 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/552814 |
17 |
> |
18 |
> du -hs /var/db/repos/gentoo |
19 |
> 350M /var/db/repos/gentoo |
20 |
> |
21 |
> example /etc/portage/repos.conf/gentoo.conf : |
22 |
> [DEFAULT] |
23 |
> main-repo = gentoo |
24 |
> |
25 |
> [gentoo] |
26 |
> auto-sync = yes |
27 |
> location = /var/db/repos/gentoo |
28 |
> sync-type = git |
29 |
> sync-uri = https://github.com/gentoo-mirror/gentoo.git |
30 |
> sync-depth = 1 |
31 |
> sync-git-clone-extra-opts = -b master |
32 |
> sync-git-verify-commit-signature = true |
33 |
> |
34 |
> |
35 |
> sync is almost instantaneous compared to rsync, but some folks not going |
36 |
> to |
37 |
> like github as a mirror in this case. |
38 |
> |
39 |
|
40 |
I don't plan on using github for the mirror, so I'm not overly worried |
41 |
about that portion. |
42 |
|
43 |
+Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> |
44 |
|
45 |
My recollection was that git doesn't ship with ebuild metadata by default, |
46 |
so even if we make the first sync fast (by using depth=1 in the clone) do |
47 |
we have a good story for ebuild metadata? Is portage just faster than in |
48 |
the past for ebuilds with missing metadata? Does emerge --sync handle |
49 |
metadata regen for syncs with git origins? |
50 |
|
51 |
-A |
52 |
|
53 |
|
54 |
> |
55 |
> |
56 |
> -- |
57 |
> Georgy Yakovlev |
58 |
> Gentoo Linux Developer |