1 |
On Sun, 15 Feb 2015 01:35:40 +0300 |
2 |
Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 22:31:48 +0000 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
4 |
> > On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 23:23:48 +0100 |
5 |
> > Alexander Berntsen <bernalex@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
> > > On 14/02/15 23:13, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
7 |
> > > > That's how Git works. |
8 |
> > > |
9 |
> > > Consider contributors (Gentoo developers or not) that want to |
10 |
> > > submit patches to a project. They should have access to the |
11 |
> > > primary repository (git or not), and be able to contribute |
12 |
> > > without being forced to use proprietary software. This is |
13 |
> > > incredibly easy to facilitate, so I don't expect us to have a |
14 |
> > > problem related to github and our social mission here. |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > What if their ISP runs proprietary software to manage its network? |
17 |
> > Will Gentoo accept patches by pigeon? (Obviously the postal service |
18 |
> > can't be relied upon to not use proprietary software.) |
19 |
> |
20 |
> One should not confuse transparent data transmission mediator and |
21 |
> active data management engine required to create, submit or |
22 |
> apply changes. |
23 |
|
24 |
What's the difference between connecting to a proprietary Git server |
25 |
over an open network stack, and connecting to an open Git server over a |
26 |
proprietary network stack? |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Ciaran McCreesh |