1 |
Gah, wrong sender address...why can't gmail just noticed that my |
2 |
gentoo.org address was in the thread before; I have no idea... |
3 |
|
4 |
On 1/19/08, Alec Warner <antarus@×××××××××××.com> wrote: |
5 |
> On 1/19/08, Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
6 |
> > Dominik Riva wrote: |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > > On Jan 15, 2008 2:15 PM, Wulf C. Krueger <philantrop@g.o> wrote: |
9 |
> > > |
10 |
> > >> Please explain why I should care about the Gentoo Foundation in your |
11 |
> > >> opinion. |
12 |
> > > |
13 |
> > > Maybe because it is a the part of Gentoo was designed to holds Gentoo's |
14 |
> > > assets? Things like the logo, servers, name, ... oh and don't forget the |
15 |
> > > money - all rather unimportant things, right? |
16 |
> > > |
17 |
> > Well I for one would like the option of never reincorporating to be |
18 |
> > discussed. The only thing that would matter is the trademark/brand. Infra |
19 |
> > seems to be owned by others in any case, people and organisations who use |
20 |
> > Gentoo as part of their work and thus have a vested interest in it |
21 |
> > continuing. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> We have existing relationships we would like to maintain and that |
24 |
> requires having a legal entity to maintian them. Having that entity |
25 |
> be a single individual leads us with a SPOF; hence the time currently |
26 |
> being spent to re-instate the foundation. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> -Alec |
29 |
> |
30 |
-- |
31 |
gentoo-project@l.g.o mailing list |