Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] [RFC] GLEP 76: Copyright Policy
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2018 07:09:40
Message-Id: 23334.2349.842830.951587@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] [RFC] GLEP 76: Copyright Policy by Kent Fredric
1 >>>>> On Sun, 17 Jun 2018, Kent Fredric wrote:
2
3 > On Sat, 16 Jun 2018 22:39:51 -0400
4 > Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote:
5
6 >> The policy does not require anybody to do "busy work" - it just tells
7 >> you what to put in the copyright notice line when you're editing it.
8 >> You don't have to look at the notice when you're making random ebuild
9 >> changes.
10
11 > On Sun, 10 Jun 2018 22:34:45 +0200
12 > Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote:
13
14 >> - The copyright notice, especially for ebuilds, will contain the
15 >> name of the largest contributor, plus an "and others" clause when
16 >> necessary. (So the "Copyright Gentoo Foundation" lines will be
17 >> phased out.)
18
19 > - **ESPECIALLY** for ebuilds
20 > - **WILL CONTAIN**
21 > - So the "Copyright Gentoo Foundation" lines **WILL BE** phased out
22
23 > So you can understand where this animosity comes from, esp as your
24 > comments and Ulrich's seem to directly contradict each other.
25
26 I don't see a contradiction there. You don't update the notice when
27 making a small ebuild change.
28
29 But of course, notices that are completely inaccurate (e.g., listing
30 an entity that hasn't been assigned copyright) should be replaced.
31 This needs to be done only once.
32
33 Ulrich