1 |
>>>>> On Sun, 17 Jun 2018, Kent Fredric wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Sat, 16 Jun 2018 22:39:51 -0400 |
4 |
> Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
|
6 |
>> The policy does not require anybody to do "busy work" - it just tells |
7 |
>> you what to put in the copyright notice line when you're editing it. |
8 |
>> You don't have to look at the notice when you're making random ebuild |
9 |
>> changes. |
10 |
|
11 |
> On Sun, 10 Jun 2018 22:34:45 +0200 |
12 |
> Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
13 |
|
14 |
>> - The copyright notice, especially for ebuilds, will contain the |
15 |
>> name of the largest contributor, plus an "and others" clause when |
16 |
>> necessary. (So the "Copyright Gentoo Foundation" lines will be |
17 |
>> phased out.) |
18 |
|
19 |
> - **ESPECIALLY** for ebuilds |
20 |
> - **WILL CONTAIN** |
21 |
> - So the "Copyright Gentoo Foundation" lines **WILL BE** phased out |
22 |
|
23 |
> So you can understand where this animosity comes from, esp as your |
24 |
> comments and Ulrich's seem to directly contradict each other. |
25 |
|
26 |
I don't see a contradiction there. You don't update the notice when |
27 |
making a small ebuild change. |
28 |
|
29 |
But of course, notices that are completely inaccurate (e.g., listing |
30 |
an entity that hasn't been assigned copyright) should be replaced. |
31 |
This needs to be done only once. |
32 |
|
33 |
Ulrich |