1 |
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On 19:25 Mon 07 Nov , Rich Freeman wrote: |
3 |
>> Well, that at least is enforceable. Once PR figures out which one is the |
4 |
>> real one the trustees can probably send a polite note to the rest |
5 |
>> explaining the situation and asking for the logo to be removed. Use of the |
6 |
>> logo as an identifying mark should be limited to official use. |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> (Not speaking officially for anybody but myself.) |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Meh. See trademark guidelines regarding community projects and sites. |
11 |
|
12 |
That page actually needs a bit of an overhaul - this has been |
13 |
discussed in the Trustee meetings for a few months now. The current |
14 |
policy works but isn't very flexible for things like community sites |
15 |
and such and addressed trademark law but not copyright law (which |
16 |
applies to the logo). |
17 |
|
18 |
That guideline you pointed to does not give community sites any rights |
19 |
to use the logo - only the name "Gentoo." Read it carefully. |
20 |
|
21 |
The non-commercial use guidelines of the logo would apply (assuming |
22 |
the use is indeed non-commercial). So, a clear statement that the |
23 |
site is NOT part of the Gentoo project or under the control of the |
24 |
Gentoo Foundation would be required. |
25 |
|
26 |
Anybody with thoughts around the Gentoo logo is welcome to |
27 |
comment/participate in the discussion. One policy that has been |
28 |
contrasted with Gentoo's is Debian's - which has separate logos for |
29 |
community vs official use, and also which has clear guidelines on when |
30 |
you can put it on stuff like servers/media/etc. |
31 |
|
32 |
The reality has been that we really haven't had many problems with |
33 |
trademarks over the years and we're not exactly a litigious |
34 |
organization. If a website were causing confusion and they really |
35 |
were Gentoo supporters I imagine that they'd be cooperative. |
36 |
|
37 |
In any case, the intent of my email wasn't really to suggest that we |
38 |
go running around sending out complaints, but more the opposite - to |
39 |
indicate that we shouldn't panic over the site-creation stampede since |
40 |
we do have the ability to sort it all out. |
41 |
|
42 |
Rich |