1 |
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto |
2 |
<jmbsvicetto@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> To all the others that are upset because everyone is already nominated, I'd |
4 |
> like to recall everyone if free to nominate. It is custom practice to have |
5 |
> developers nominated more than once. Before anyone asks, that is also valid |
6 |
> under the current rules. |
7 |
|
8 |
So, I brought it up because issues like this are better addressed |
9 |
before there are misunderstandings than after. |
10 |
|
11 |
Still, traditionally in the past we've had tables of nominees, whether |
12 |
they accepted, links to manifestos, etc. That doesn't work quite as |
13 |
elegantly when everybody is nominated. |
14 |
|
15 |
Also, a bulk nomination like this may discourage others from |
16 |
re-nominating the same individual. Nominations are as much about |
17 |
encouraging people to seriously run for office and not just a process. |
18 |
Otherwise we'd just nominate ourselves. I don't want somebody who |
19 |
might not have seriously considered running for council to not |
20 |
consider doing so because somebody didn't think to nominate them |
21 |
because technically it was already done. |
22 |
|
23 |
But, this isn't a big deal either way. I won't make any assumptions |
24 |
as to what the full intent of nominating almost everybody was. Wulf |
25 |
can say whatever he cares to if he cares to. |
26 |
|
27 |
So, just about everybody is nominated now, but don't let that |
28 |
discourage anybody from re-nominating others or running if they think |
29 |
there is some good they can do. |
30 |
|
31 |
Rich |