1 |
> |
2 |
> maybe we could also try contacting the Free Software Foundation on the |
3 |
> matters. This is probably what they are doing. |
4 |
> """ |
5 |
> If a contributor wants the FSF to publish only a pseudonym, that is ok. The |
6 |
> contributor should say this, and state the desired pseudonym, when |
7 |
> answering the request- form. The actual legal papers will use the real |
8 |
> name, but the FSF will publish only the pseudonym. When using one of the |
9 |
> other forms, fill in the real name but ask the contributor to discuss the |
10 |
> use of a pseudonym with assign@×××.org before sending back the signed form. |
11 |
> [1] """ |
12 |
> [1]https://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/Copyright-Papers.html |
13 |
|
14 |
As a side note, this concerns the FSF *copyright assignment*. |
15 |
|
16 |
We deliberately decided *not* to do any such assignment (which is void in |
17 |
parts of the world anyway) or a FLA (which would be the legally saner |
18 |
alternative) since that involves even more paperwork and legalities that can |
19 |
be debated to death. |
20 |
|
21 |
Now, if someone transfers under a pseudonym his/her rights to a known legal |
22 |
body, and that body accepts usage of the pseudonym, then that body can |
23 |
contribute the code under its name with the DCO. This just shifts |
24 |
accountability though. |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
Andreas K. Hüttel |
28 |
dilfridge@g.o |
29 |
Gentoo Linux developer |
30 |
(council, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice) |