| 1 |
On 7/9/15 6:05 PM, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> * Gentoo needs consistency in terms of policies. For example, right now |
| 3 |
> we have https://devmanual.gentoo.org and |
| 4 |
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Quality_Assurance/Policies. The qa |
| 5 |
> policies page contradicts some things in the developer manual, so there |
| 6 |
> is no clear way to point to the official policies. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Could you give examples of the inconsistencies? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Please consider e.g. filing bugs for each issue. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> * The Gentoo Code of Conduct still needs to be revisited. We started |
| 13 |
> that process this term, but it was not completed. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Could you elaborate on that? I'd agree Code of Conduct is important, |
| 16 |
just wondering what specifically would you like to do. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> * The council should only be asked to make a decision on an issue when |
| 19 |
> the issue cannot be settled by the community itself. As it has been said |
| 20 |
> by others, the council should do what it can to stay out |
| 21 |
> of the way of innovations, which should come from the developers. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Yup, I can't agree more with this. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Curious though - do you think the current Council wasn't acting |
| 26 |
according to above approach? If so, could you give examples? |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Paweł |
Archives