| 1 |
On 16/05/14 15:31, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 15/05/14 20:17, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 7:21 AM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> Sergey Popov: |
| 5 |
>>>> And yes, we need tinderbox. But, c'mon. stop talking loudly on ML and |
| 6 |
>>>> get things done if you can. |
| 7 |
>>>> |
| 8 |
>>> This is like working on patches while upstream already said "not |
| 9 |
>>> interested". |
| 10 |
>>> |
| 11 |
>>> Since QA doesn't think it's their job to run a tinderbox, I will work |
| 12 |
>>> with those people who actually care about it, instead of QA. |
| 13 |
>> Perhaps you should let QA speak for what it thinks its job is? Note |
| 14 |
>> that random posts in random bugs by random members of QA isn't the |
| 15 |
>> same as QA saying something. |
| 16 |
> Except it is, that's what QA just voted in their own meeting, |
| 17 |
> one QA member represents the whole team. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Quality_Assurance/Meeting_Summaries#Unclarities_wrt_what_.22QA_team.22_is |
Archives