| 1 |
Samuli Suominen: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On 09/05/14 21:37, Tom Wijsman wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> It's counterproductive, means now user needs to read sourcecode of |
| 5 |
>>> each package to determine it for himself, no global USE="gtk" |
| 6 |
>>> possible anymore, massive pollution of package.use. |
| 7 |
>> So, rehashing it in a thread to which it is unrelated yields no results. |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I'm not so sure, it seems QA is picking policies as per what some loud |
| 11 |
> people on the ML say as opposed to giving overwhelming technical arguments |
| 12 |
> their proper weight |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Well, if QA team members confuses "bugs" with "bug reports" and say they |
| 16 |
don't want to do actual work (aka tinderbox), because it would cause |
| 17 |
more "bugs", then I have serious doubts about their technical |
| 18 |
understanding of certain issues. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Sure, there is always more than one opinion and I'm not posting here |
| 21 |
because someone decided against my own opinion, but because there is no |
| 22 |
clear decision whatsoever. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
This isn't the first time... you probably know, the gtk3 vs gtk2 vs gtk |
| 25 |
flag issue is still UNRESOLVED. I pushed for a clear decision often |
| 26 |
enough (must be more than a year now) and here we are, still without any. |
| 27 |
The same applies for tinderbox, applies for pkg-config discussion, |
| 28 |
applies for... |
Archives