Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-08-12
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 11:40:47
Message-Id: lrd9v0$ehm$1@ger.gmane.org
In Reply to: Re: Re: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-08-12 by Rich Freeman
1 On 07/31/2014 08:53 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
2 > Some options open to the council are:
3 > 1. Let the games project keep its policy, and anybody who wants to
4 > change this has to join the project and call for elections (the
5 > council can shoe-horn members onto the project if necessary).
6 > 2. Directly tweak games policy but preserve the project and its
7 > scope. So, games would still have to adhere to games project policy,
8 > but the Council might change specific policies (use of eclass, group,
9 > etc).
10 > 3. Restrict the games project scope, such as giving it authority if
11 > the package maintainer elects to put it in the games herd.
12 > 4. Do nothing.
13
14 Do options 1 and 2 mean endorsing the Games project as "special" (eg.
15 like QA or ComRel)? This is concerning, and not in the spirit of GLEP 39.
16
17 Options 3 and 4 are the same. Nobody has yet been able to provide any
18 evidence that the Games team has any elevated authority since GLEP 39
19 was implemented.