| 1 |
> On 1 Apr 2022, at 02:27, Sam James <sam@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
>> On 29 Mar 2022, at 18:56, Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> [snip] |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> this is all orthogonal to the git content itself (objects, branches, tags, |
| 6 |
>> etc...). those should remain in the read-only clobber mode that exists now. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> there is no downside for Gentoo here. it's all functionality that can be |
| 9 |
>> had for free, does not introduce any risks, and many devs are already using |
| 10 |
>> GH heavily for Gentoo projects -- albeit, they don't do it under the Gentoo |
| 11 |
>> umbrella, they fork it into their own personal space and maintain it there. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Yep, and I'm guilty of this as well. I've started making a list of some important |
| 14 |
> repos we really need to mirror onto our infra at least (inc, but not limited to, |
| 15 |
> pkgcore). |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Sorry, just to finish making the point I'd intended on here: while this might |
| 19 |
be true, I don't think it's a reason to depend on it more where there's |
| 20 |
a decent argument against it. It's just a reason to actually migrate |
| 21 |
away or at least ensure we have contingencies? |
Archives