1 |
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 1:36 PM Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 06:18:43PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: |
4 |
> > Hello, |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > Here's another question for the Council nominees. I'd like to ask |
7 |
> > the Council members to disclose their corporate affiliations, |
8 |
> > in particular whether they are employed or in partnership with companies |
9 |
> > using Gentoo or Gentoo derivatives. |
10 |
> While I would like to know this information, I'm not sure that it can be |
11 |
> disclosed in every case. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> I would consider it entirely possible that a council member works for a |
14 |
> company, that has then bound via NDA, to not be permitted to make public |
15 |
> statements about what their company uses or does not use. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Further, for larger companies, I would see it entirely possible that the |
18 |
> council member does not know about Gentoo usage in every corner of the |
19 |
> company: the company is just too large. |
20 |
|
21 |
I would leave it to individuals to disclose what they can. |
22 |
|
23 |
I think the main concern is with people affiliated with companies who |
24 |
are paying them to develop for Gentoo since the company uses Gentoo. |
25 |
Ie their employer has a direct interest in what we're doing. |
26 |
|
27 |
If you work in a mailroom at Airbus you probably wouldn't know if |
28 |
somebody is using Gentoo in the A380 flight control system, but really |
29 |
that isn't the kind of relationship most here are likely to care about |
30 |
anyway. |
31 |
|
32 |
I don't think there should be an expectation that people disclose all |
33 |
their other affiliations if they have nothing at all to do with |
34 |
Gentoo. The concern is that some company is paying somebody to run |
35 |
for the Council/etc. |
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
Rich |