Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Thomas Sachau <tommy@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Status update of Sunrise project?
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:12:53
Message-Id: 5527F6D7.7010404@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Status update of Sunrise project? by Ben de Groot
1 Ben de Groot schrieb:
2 > I know the difference. But the two projects have similar goals: review
3 > user submitted ebuilds, and commit them to an central repo to make
4 > them available to a wider public. I think it would be good to get more
5 > packages from sunrise into the main gentoo repo.
6 >
7 > Are there reasons for some of those packages to be kept out of the main repo?
8
9 I think, the main reason is the required amount of developer time needed
10 for that move and the continued maintainence of the moved packages.
11
12 Sunrise has the advantage, that the packages per dev ratio is higher
13 then for packages proxied in the main tree as the user does all the work
14 (prepare, test, commit and update the ebuilds), the devs do just a
15 review of the ebuild itself during the first commit or for bigger
16 changes, so less time per packages required.
17
18 --
19
20 Thomas Sachau
21 Gentoo Linux Developer

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] Status update of Sunrise project? Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o>