| 1 |
Am Montag, 4. September 2017, 23:05:51 CEST schrieb Paweł Hajdan, Jr.: |
| 2 |
> On 04/09/2017 20:37, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 3 |
> > ...or dumping Gentoo for a distribution that doesn't dump huge breakage |
| 4 |
> > on users in week's time. Guess which one is more likely to happen. |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > If our purpose is just to show the middle finger to users, why not |
| 7 |
> > remove the keyword altogether and stop pretending it's there when it |
| 8 |
> > clearly isn't? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Do we have any data about possible size of affected user base? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Essentially no. (cue gentoostats here) |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
However, in some cases we do have data - e.g., when we know that an arch was |
| 15 |
completely broken and noone noticed. There were some such bugs- whoever knows |
| 16 |
best please post examples in reply... |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Andreas K. Hüttel |
| 21 |
dilfridge@g.o |
| 22 |
Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice) |
Archives