Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2013-04-09
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 15:22:56
Message-Id: 515C4938.6000508@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2013-04-09 by "vivo75@gmail.com"
1 On 04/03/2013 02:31 AM, vivo75@×××××.com wrote:
2 > 3 years are pratically more than you can ever hope to support without
3 > adding manpower dedicated to keep backward compatibility.
4 >
5 > Previous reasoning based on the assumption that a) newer api are better
6 > b) less of them is better c) not being able to upgrade portage mean a
7 > not upgradable/modifiable gentoo install.
8
9 It's a little bit silly to try to maintain backward compatibility for
10 more than 3 years when you can easily revive an old system by bind
11 mounting it into a fresh chroot as suggested here:
12
13 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457148
14 --
15 Thanks,
16 Zac

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2013-04-09 "vivo75@×××××.com" <vivo75@×××××.com>