| 1 |
On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 6:27:38 PM EDT NP-Hardass wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Then go to council and appeal. In a court, if policies and procedures |
| 4 |
> aren't followed, it is on the defendant to bring suit against the |
| 5 |
> plaintiff to assert that their rights were violated. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
No, that is not how the law works. No one is prosecuted and then has to appeal |
| 8 |
when policies and procedures were not followed in the first place. That would |
| 9 |
be the easiest appeal in the world... Try to submit evidence that was |
| 10 |
illegally obtained. Thankfully courts do not operate that way. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> Go file your |
| 13 |
> appeal already... Once you've done that, come back and talk policy on |
| 14 |
> how to reform ComRel. Either that or give up on trying to get back in |
| 15 |
> for now and just focus on trying to reform ComRel. Right now, you are |
| 16 |
> getting nowhere and just wearing down anyone who might support you. |
| 17 |
> Pick a course of action and stick to it. Appeal or try to reform ComRel |
| 18 |
> in a fashion unrelated to your non-appeal. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Option 3 |
| 21 |
Work with recruiters. Get past this BS! Do not waste the councils time with |
| 22 |
such non-sense! |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Option 4 |
| 25 |
I do nothing. My choice back in 2008. Just let things be neglected. |
| 26 |
The status quo... |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
I want comrel to leave me alone! Stop preventing me from working! In some way |
| 29 |
that requires the least effort from all.... |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Simply for Comrel to get out of the way, since 2008, preventing technical |
| 32 |
progress. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
Archives