Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo, GitHub, and the Social Contract
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 19:09:02
Message-Id: 20150215190855.24ba8e86@googlemail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo, GitHub, and the Social Contract by "Anthony G. Basile"
1 On Sun, 15 Feb 2015 13:39:16 -0500
2 "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o> wrote:
3 > On 02/15/15 12:42, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
4 > > On Sun, 15 Feb 2015 11:17:54 -0500
5 > > "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o> wrote:
6 > >> But the big difference here is that github is a company while infra
7 > >> is volunteer work.
8 > > And the equipment and hosting is paid for by...
9 > >
10 >
11 > You mean the folks like osuosl or other institutions run by
12 > grants :P Or is that not the answer you were expecting?
13
14 No, that's exactly what I mean. What if OSUOSL or some other
15 institution decides they'll pull funding unless the entire Gentoo
16 Gnome team is fired? Or what if the government funding them announces
17 that they can't use their money to accept contributions from or
18 give benefit to countries in the Axis of Evil?
19
20 The idea that Gentoo is currently immune to these kinds of pressures,
21 but suddenly wouldn't be if Github were to be used for hosting, isn't
22 really grounded in reality...
23
24 --
25 Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo, GitHub, and the Social Contract Seemant Kulleen <seemantk@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo, GitHub, and the Social Contract "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o>