| 1 |
>>>>> On Wed, 12 Jun 2013, hasufell wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On 06/12/2013 05:41 PM, Ben de Groot wrote: |
| 4 |
>> "Do what I say, or I will take over your package and do it anyway" |
| 5 |
>> is a really funny way of working together... |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> In most places I know this would be called bullying. I don't want |
| 8 |
>> to spend my free time on a project that condones that kind of |
| 9 |
>> behaviour. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> You are not giving _any_ kind of technical argument against the |
| 12 |
> proposed enhancement... except authority. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> And that is not enough. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
There was the argument that the unit file wasn't accepted upstream, |
| 17 |
and I wouldn't dismiss this lightly. Often it's a cleaner solution if |
| 18 |
files foreign to a package are installed by a separate supplementary |
| 19 |
package. It avoids recompilation of the original package by the user, |
| 20 |
for example. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Ulrich |
Archives