1 |
On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 23:12:42 +0200 |
2 |
Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> What do you think? Would you mind getting that amount of mail once? |
5 |
> Any other ideas? |
6 |
|
7 |
From the mail I got, ( which I didn't mind ), I felt there was one |
8 |
distinguisher that was missing: |
9 |
|
10 |
"active" vs "passive" membership. |
11 |
|
12 |
Like, I get the impression ( with perl for instance ) that although |
13 |
many of its members are "around", and they occasionally "do something", |
14 |
I'm not sure they can all count as "There" in terms of staff-power |
15 |
metrics. |
16 |
|
17 |
If you make one commit every 6 months, are you really still "active"? |
18 |
|
19 |
Its useful to keep them all on the list, because they're people who |
20 |
have knowledge and can do the work if it comes there way, so I don't |
21 |
think *removing* them is the right thing to do. |
22 |
|
23 |
But for keeping tabs on "do we need more staff or not", it just serves |
24 |
as a confusing source of data. |