| 1 |
Am Samstag, 13. Mai 2017, 09:44:29 CEST schrieb Michał Górny: |
| 2 |
> Looks mostly good. Aside to some typos: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> a. 'Meaning of the second column values for other tools' says that |
| 5 |
> stabilization requests on bugzilla are based on second column; I think |
| 6 |
> you should update this to account for the third column. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Done (actually I just deleted the reference to bz there). |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> b. Do we need a fourth column for keyword requests? I guess not since if |
| 11 |
> we stop supporting specific ~arch, we can probably remove it completely. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
We don't even have this case now. |
| 14 |
(Which is why I'm accumulating open m68k keyword requests...) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> Which brings the next question.... |
| 17 |
> c. What should be the behavior for arches that are not listed |
| 18 |
> in arches.desc when the file is present? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
That's defined - stable. (see the paragraph on the meaning of second column |
| 21 |
stable, or the backwards compatibility.) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Andreas K. Hüttel |
| 25 |
dilfridge@g.o |
| 26 |
Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice) |
Archives