1 |
Am Mittwoch, 26. Februar 2020, 18:18:54 CET schrieb Rich Freeman: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Proctors basically hasn't done anything in the last 6 months or so and |
4 |
> I think part of it is that the few actions that have been taken have |
5 |
> almost exclusively received negative feedback. I can't remember the |
6 |
> last time that somebody thanked me for taking some action (and unlike |
7 |
> Comrel the actions of proctors are much more visible). How is that to |
8 |
> be interpreted as anything other than a community consensus that the |
9 |
> actions were inappropriate? And if so, why would we want to keep |
10 |
> doing it? Perhaps ignoring all requests for intervention is an |
11 |
> improvement. Certainly I've seen far fewer complaints about inaction |
12 |
> than past actions. No doubt this isn't helping with the Comrel |
13 |
> workload. |
14 |
|
15 |
This. Whenever comrel actually does something feedback is at least 90% |
16 |
negative, and everyone else thinks he knows better what should have been done. |
17 |
The result is a dozen mailing list threads, weeks if not months long infighting |
18 |
and people not talking to each other. |
19 |
|
20 |
I haven't read most of the thread (and only bother with the latest mails |
21 |
because Mikle asked me to) since I have enough of the same arguments being |
22 |
brought up for years and years. It's just wasting time. Time that could be |
23 |
used more productively, both inside comrel and for normal work contributing to |
24 |
Gentoo. |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
Andreas K. Hüttel |
28 |
dilfridge@g.o |
29 |
Gentoo Linux developer |
30 |
(council, qa, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice) |