1 |
Ühel kenal päeval, R, 29.06.2018 kell 08:15, kirjutas Eray Aslan: |
2 |
> Just a few sentences on the questions below would be nice. |
3 |
> |
4 |
> 1/ What do you think of closing gentoo-dev ML to the general public? |
5 |
|
6 |
It is not closed to the general public, only limited posting. This is |
7 |
the same as various other mediums have been, except for gentoo-dev this |
8 |
is a change of status quo. |
9 |
If I would have been part of council at the time of the votes, I would |
10 |
have likely voted against closing general public posting, but in |
11 |
practice serving on the council would have meant more pondering and |
12 |
serious thinking of it and I might have reached to the same conclusion |
13 |
of having to do this for the time being, until a better solution |
14 |
emerges. |
15 |
I hope we can try a different solution at some point soon, as the |
16 |
underlying mailing list infrastructure gets upgraded (e.g. to better |
17 |
support different forms of moderation). I don't think we should change |
18 |
the current status quo yet again without a potential different solution |
19 |
to try out for the underlying problem that triggered this change. |
20 |
|
21 |
> 2/ Where do you think Gentoo stands in the Linux ecosystem? Who do |
22 |
> you |
23 |
> think are its users? |
24 |
|
25 |
It's for the power users that care what and how exactly they have |
26 |
installed, administrators that make that decision for many, or those |
27 |
that want to learn how these things work. Also for people that learned |
28 |
the ways and are now simply using Gentoo as their home distributions, |
29 |
while actually not tweaking or configuring it much at all - only when |
30 |
needed, knowing that power is there. Regarding that, I believe we are |
31 |
sometimes too much forcing users to make a choice on things, failing to |
32 |
give the choice of not making a choice themselves (e.g. REQUIRED_USE |
33 |
setups that often end up requiring configuration choices in |
34 |
package.use). |
35 |
|
36 |
In a broader sense it's a meta-distribution for other things to be |
37 |
based on (ChromeOS, derivatives, etc) - unfortunately I don't think we |
38 |
cater towards this use case very well ourselves. |
39 |
|
40 |
We should work towards improving our strengths to regain more of our |
41 |
standing in the Linux ecosystem, and drive it home with appropriate PR |
42 |
work. But this needs volunteers to do the work, but I believe leaders |
43 |
in the community can encourage such volunteers to step up and empower |
44 |
them to get things done. I believe council members should act as such |
45 |
leaders. |
46 |
|
47 |
|
48 |
Mart |