1 |
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Ciaran McCreesh |
2 |
<ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> On Fri, 18 Jul 2014 07:37:09 -0400 |
4 |
> Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
>> Don't take rankings too personally. The algorithm has to stick |
6 |
>> something at the top, and something at the bottom, and it isn't like |
7 |
>> we have tons of dead wood on the ballot. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> The more interesting issue is the number of times some people were |
10 |
> ranked below _ron, though. There are people serving on the Council who, |
11 |
> for some developers, are less preferable than rerunning the entire |
12 |
> election with new candidates. |
13 |
> |
14 |
|
15 |
Whatever. Votes are preferences. I'd just as soon that people be |
16 |
honest with them. I sometimes vote for people below reopen and I'm |
17 |
not going to be bothered if some place me below it. You can never |
18 |
elect a body that matches everybody's preferences, and I'd like to |
19 |
think that people would tend to vote for council members that will |
20 |
strive to at least try to represent everybody regardless of whether |
21 |
they disagree. |
22 |
|
23 |
For my part, if somebody thinks I'm about to do something stupid, |
24 |
you're always welcome to let me know. I try to post my feelings on |
25 |
any controversial issue on -project before any meeting to give people |
26 |
the opportunity to do just that. I can't promise that I'll agree, but |
27 |
I will listen with the assumption that devs in general are fairly |
28 |
smart people. Usually I try to favor compromises that at least |
29 |
provide some way for everybody to get what they want, since that is |
30 |
the "Gentoo Way(TM)." |
31 |
|
32 |
Rich |