1 |
On 19-04-13 18:30:18, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
2 |
> > Yes, I am dissatisfied. I am especially dissatisfied by the absurd |
3 |
> > bureaucracy and unclear jurisdiction. I've seen QA claiming we don't |
4 |
> > have authority and sending me to ComRel, and being sent back to QA |
5 |
> > because 'it's QA business'. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> I would like to support that this needs clarification. We have seen too many |
8 |
> things bounced back and forth between qa and comrel and come to nothing in the |
9 |
> past. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> * person X commits crap (as per qa guideline) |
12 |
> * someone Y complains (shouts at him) |
13 |
> * person X continues to commit crap |
14 |
> * qa leaves a marked statement |
15 |
> * person X continues to commit crap |
16 |
> * Y shouts more |
17 |
> * X complains to comrel |
18 |
> * qa asks comrel to do something |
19 |
> * comrel is more worried about Y than about X |
20 |
> ("X is technical issue, not our business") |
21 |
> ... |
22 |
> |
23 |
> please fill in your own preference for x and y |
24 |
> |
25 |
|
26 |
Perhaps QA can refer to council as tech stuff is their domain and seems |
27 |
like the right escalation path (to me). They meet monthly but I'm not |
28 |
sure comrel is much quicker (honestly don't know). One of the council |
29 |
members could possibly push for quicker 'discipline' but I'd rather not |
30 |
rush that aspect. |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) |