1 |
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> On 15/05/14 20:17, Rich Freeman wrote: |
4 |
>> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 7:21 AM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
>>> Sergey Popov: |
6 |
>>>> And yes, we need tinderbox. But, c'mon. stop talking loudly on ML and |
7 |
>>>> get things done if you can. |
8 |
>>>> |
9 |
>>> This is like working on patches while upstream already said "not |
10 |
>>> interested". |
11 |
>>> |
12 |
>>> Since QA doesn't think it's their job to run a tinderbox, I will work |
13 |
>>> with those people who actually care about it, instead of QA. |
14 |
>> Perhaps you should let QA speak for what it thinks its job is? Note |
15 |
>> that random posts in random bugs by random members of QA isn't the |
16 |
>> same as QA saying something. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Except it is, that's what QA just voted in their own meeting, |
19 |
> one QA member represents the whole team. |
20 |
|
21 |
I suspect the intent of their vote was that QA members could take |
22 |
action individually in the name of QA. That doesn't necessarily mean |
23 |
that every time you sneeze and a QA member says "God bless you" that |
24 |
QA is making an official proclamation on the Gentoo state religion. |
25 |
|
26 |
The QA team is a bit immature, but it is good practice to be explicit |
27 |
when you're speaking on behalf of an official role. I'm on the |
28 |
Council, but nothing I'm posting in this email represents the opinion |
29 |
of the Council, and beyond general code of conduct nobody is going to |
30 |
get in trouble for ignoring it. On the other hand, I just posted the |
31 |
official summary of the last Council meeting and everybody should |
32 |
assume by default that it DOES represent the opinion of the Council |
33 |
and is enforceable. That doesn't mean that somebody couldn't point |
34 |
out a mistake and have it corrected, but it should be viewed as having |
35 |
a place of authority. However, when I'm posting random emails to the |
36 |
lists, they should be viewed as my own personal opinion whether I |
37 |
state so or not, especially since we tend to appoint roles like |
38 |
QA/Comrel/Council/etc out of our active developer body and we don't |
39 |
hire full-time professionals who only do those roles. |
40 |
|
41 |
So, maybe what QA voted on was a bit sloppy, but if we want every |
42 |
Gentoo policy to be absolutely without ambiguity or loophole than I'll |
43 |
find something better to do with my time. I'm personally convinced |
44 |
that writing perfect laws to govern human behavior makes writing |
45 |
perfect software seem almost trivial in comparison. |
46 |
|
47 |
Rich |