| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA512 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 08/02/2011 12:10 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: |
| 5 |
> On 01-08-2011 20:46, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 6 |
>> On 08/01/2011 08:32 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 7 |
>>> On 01-08-2011 20:16:34 +0100, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 8 |
>>>>> Would you mind summarising/drafting up the policy for who can |
| 9 |
>>>>> and who can't get a cloak? This is probably going to be the |
| 10 |
>>>>> GLEP that Petteri refers to. Does it make sense to vote for |
| 11 |
>>>>> this topic without that GLEP in place? |
| 12 |
>>>>> |
| 13 |
>>>> Anyone can (should) get a cloak upon developer's request. |
| 14 |
>>>> Petteri suggested to have the council vote and transfer the |
| 15 |
>>>> responsibility to devrel, which in accordance will include this |
| 16 |
>>>> in a new GLEP defining the devrel policy just like then one for |
| 17 |
>>>> QA. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
>>> Ok, thanks. Am I correct by summarising this point as simply a vote |
| 20 |
>>> for transferring the cloak responsibility to devrel? |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
>> Yes I think this is pretty much the gist. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> No, I'm sorry but that's not the point. |
| 26 |
> First, these users issues need to be moved to "community relations", the |
| 27 |
> project I and Petteri have been talking about to unite DevRel and UserRel. |
| 28 |
> In any case, the 2 issues at stake here are: |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> 1. Do we want / support gentoo/user cloaks or not? If so, what is needed |
| 31 |
> for anyone to get them. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Based on the thread I used as a reference on the original e-mail nobody |
| 34 |
raised any objections so I assumed that "Yes we want them". |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
> 2. What should gentoo/contributor cloaks mean? Should they be reserved |
| 37 |
> to ATs/HTs/other official project members? How can they be requested / |
| 38 |
> validated? |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
This does not look like a council issue. It fits perfectly to the |
| 42 |
"community relations" you mentioned before. |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
That's why I said that the council has to transfer the responsibility to |
| 45 |
the one of the two *Rel projects. |
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
- -- |
| 48 |
Regards, |
| 49 |
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 |
| 50 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 51 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) |
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJON7ExAAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCNuwP/2HfY0kQSnU1WB2VYoZu65Wh |
| 54 |
PTVZJHnJa7n2QfdlRJdP/XLdZduMX8cpSy7oa7BwlgMdLtZykjVcFvA0PUWOLFtk |
| 55 |
EBCDnT1mAONixuaoj6ksi1aUvVso7xp0uVb54QpoJL6wzPtEzLJLczs4sQBC/rTK |
| 56 |
NGn42Lt6rSCBjelMoJKTHkrjKGcyjH8fRd7trVSQmJ1Om7X5d08njuNJdbDRShj0 |
| 57 |
+ezlvTrW64ERc0w56hpGR+SzgRnawbTAxa/N6lPnsv+J5ZU0tkLtWPzWlj4r+niT |
| 58 |
nYfj6AncaVBYYcs9RUVpxuQdot+DPUf3wY3bVQGXUop5xHtGZeqLQr8q8juEU9a9 |
| 59 |
bf+bYK4XP+abC2TG32d+4uXKS801a2qu3+8lO3IANFYTTbmQWcHSzG4RXBFXM6rl |
| 60 |
OpjHWMmHALWVr9jhEmJgnE6L+KFsSQcyp6keGH+v1S8o1RW8vwitcDAD46gkb/OK |
| 61 |
lrjv1PwhUSN3xDpNn9Jc+P50LeUkzpZymKz9iwaija1rqYmQ9JmWAAJftSIZhU6y |
| 62 |
lsYmK7FD5RpcGQuKjDyYijPiCtnptMRG1Xar5fIQMqzyg7eMbwolSKeVC6G3Mqgg |
| 63 |
npVLBEQn4VVEj/pcn3MD5gshyfZwBHAQ/3UAX4OYuvcnVwTN/CCUfUHZSwzxkvfS |
| 64 |
gWfU06VtSj9dbcBkC7KY |
| 65 |
=zlZH |
| 66 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives