Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Matthew Thode <prometheanfire@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Foundation meeting agenda for April 2018
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 09:56:50
Message-Id: 20180409095644.7sms46nvwibycmao@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Foundation meeting agenda for April 2018 by "Andreas K. Huettel"
1 On 18-04-09 10:23:53, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
2 > Am Montag, 9. April 2018, 02:11:19 CEST schrieb zlg:
3 > > > We request that the Gentoo Council and the Board of Trustees of the
4 > > > Gentoo
5 > > > Foundation affirm Gentoo's metastructure GLEP 39 as the governing
6 > > > principle
7 > > > of the Gentoo Linux developer community. In particular, both acknowledge
8 > > > the split between
9 > > >
10 > > > - the Gentoo Council, which is responsible for the Gentoo Linux
11 > > > developer
12 > > >
13 > > > community, its user base and all technical decisions,
14 > > >
15 > > > - and the Gentoo Foundation, whose role is to hold Gentoo's assets
16 > > >
17 > > > (such as trademarks and server infrastructure) and support the
18 > > > developer
19 > > > and user community.
20 >
21 > [snip]
22 > > To the Council:
23 > >
24 > > What makes you accountable to this community? Why should we trust or
25 > > respect you when you have nothing on the line except a title? What
26 > > happens next if these affirmations are made? What's your angle, your
27 > > real motivation?
28 >
29 >
30 > This proposal describes precisely
31 > * how I was taught "Gentoo works" for my quizzes sometime around 2010
32 You could have been taught wrong
33 > * how the cooperation and separation of responsibilities between council and
34 > foundation worked for the years since then
35 Just means it's been disfunctional for years
36 > * and what was the basis of understanding for council and trustees elections
37 >
38 > Thus, we are asking for an affirmation of the status quo, nothing else.
39 What you believe the status quo to be (even if that status quo may or
40 may not be wrong).
41 >
42
43 In any case, please make individual requests to the NFP list, that is
44 where discussion should be happening. Mail on the project list is not
45 valid in the context of the foundation (making requests). This thread
46 is already going to be impossible to go though, looking for items. One
47 topic per thread, if you wish to amend the topic, do so, but take
48 sidebar discussions to another thread.
49
50 --
51 Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] Foundation meeting agenda for April 2018 Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o>