| 1 |
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 8:53 PM, Raymond Jennings <shentino@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 8:34 AM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> I don't think many people would argue that there isn't room for |
| 6 |
>> improvement. However, I think it is unrealistic to expect that the |
| 7 |
>> final solution will be 100% objective, or that it won't ultimately end |
| 8 |
>> up with trusting somebody to make the right call. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Having that trust placed in someone selected by a democratic process would |
| 11 |
> be about as close to objective as possible. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Well, that's basically the current state, as far as appeals are concerned. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Rich |
Archives