From: | Brian Evans <grknight@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-project@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-project] [rfc] /usr/portage sync source options (and recommendations) | ||
Date: | Wed, 28 Dec 2016 13:55:24 | ||
Message-Id: | 909661bc-0858-ffb3-0f8c-69e80b1ea787@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-project] [rfc] /usr/portage sync source options (and recommendations) by Sebastian Pipping |
1 | On 12/27/2016 8:37 PM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: |
2 | > |
3 | > * Git: combined mirror [1] |
4 | > |
5 | |
6 | This one is not very efficient for users to pull down since it creates |
7 | massive commits in PR branches and is bloating the repo very quickly. |
8 | As of this date, it is 1.2GiB overhead (.git dir) even when compressed. |
9 | Compared to the dev repo of 240MiB. |
10 | |
11 | Brian |
12 | |
13 | > |
14 | > [1] https://github.com/gentoo-mirror/gentoo |
15 | > [2] http://blog.siphos.be/2011/07/emerge-webrsync-and-gpg-verification/ |
16 | > |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-project] [rfc] /usr/portage sync source options (and recommendations) | Luis Ressel <aranea@×××××.de> |
Re: [gentoo-project] [rfc] /usr/portage sync source options (and recommendations) | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> |