| 1 |
>>>>> On Fri, 12 Apr 2019, Mikle Kolyada wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On 12.04.2019 18:19, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 4 |
>> IMHO we should keep that distinction, and not try to transform QA |
| 5 |
>> into a second Comrel. This has been discussed several times in the |
| 6 |
>> past, and the outcome always was that QA doesn't need such additional |
| 7 |
>> superpowers. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> Please stop spreading misinformation, |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Where have I spread misinformation? I was referring to past discussions |
| 12 |
on mailing lists and in council meetings. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> kind of this policy was discussed and then developed by Amynka and |
| 15 |
> me past summer, we just did not implement it due to internal |
| 16 |
> disagreement. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> The distinction that ComRel is about relations between devs / users |
| 19 |
> and its consequences while QA is about technical violations and its |
| 20 |
> consequences. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Exactly, and we should keep it this way. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Ulrich |
Archives