1 |
On Monday, January 23, 2017 6:05:59 AM EST Kent Fredric wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, 22 Jan 2017 11:21:12 -0500 |
3 |
> |
4 |
> "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com> wrote: |
5 |
> > Ideas are good, but to many toss out ideas not willing to do the work. Or |
6 |
> > understanding what it will take to make such ideas come to reality. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Prematurely judging ideas when they're under developed based on a conjecture |
9 |
> that the limited context you have so far indicates they "can't work" is |
10 |
> also harmful, because it simply excludes the fact there may be some data |
11 |
> you failed to consider that makes it work. |
12 |
|
13 |
That could be said to the GLEP I asked for comments on :) |
14 |
|
15 |
Just saying like with the Foundation, sponsoring, SPI, etc. People toss out |
16 |
ideas that require considerable time to make happen. I am willing to put forth |
17 |
the effort, but most are not. |
18 |
|
19 |
Most will want to toss in their 2 cents to those doing the work. Which I am |
20 |
not sure is right, because unless you are willing to donate your time. Your |
21 |
opinion some what matters, but not the same. As your idea may require |
22 |
considerable time that your expecting someone else do to do. |
23 |
|
24 |
Thus if you come up with an idea you should be willing to do the work behind |
25 |
such. Or maybe keep your opinion to yourself, if your not going to take part. |
26 |
|
27 |
> Hence, it is often effective to intentionally extend through insane ideas |
28 |
> as a thought exercise, in the assumption that you will discover a final |
29 |
> piece of the puzzle along the way, and then only judge the ideas once |
30 |
> you've gotten to a point you *must* start implementing something. |
31 |
|
32 |
To a point. More time is lost due to indecision than wrong. You cannot make |
33 |
everyone happy all the time. You can over discuss something trying to hammer |
34 |
out all details so everyone is on board and get no where doing that. To the |
35 |
point where it is never implemented. |
36 |
|
37 |
The SPI/SFC has been discussed a few times. Why has that never happened? It |
38 |
proves my point! You need to just do this stuff sometimes rather than |
39 |
endlessly discuss. Very few who discuss it will put forth the effort. |
40 |
|
41 |
> Culling the ideas before you even sit down and implement things leads to the |
42 |
> worst decision making. |
43 |
|
44 |
Yes, like others saying a GLEP will not work that has not be tried. Lots of |
45 |
negative nancy's running around. |
46 |
|
47 |
> It is the very definition of "Short sighted" |
48 |
|
49 |
I think I saw reference to Gentoo in that definition :) |
50 |
|
51 |
-- |
52 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |