| 1 |
> |
| 2 |
> So first a preface: I would prefer we accept a name until we have some |
| 3 |
> reasonable suspicion that it is wrong. |
| 4 |
> If someone submitted as "boaty mcboatface" it might immediately raise such |
| 5 |
> a suspicion; but a contributor who contributed as "John Doe" might not. Its |
| 6 |
> very subjective, yes, and we don't offer better guidelines. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
This. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> If you want to make some kind of point that "having an |
| 12 |
> opinion heard means we change the policy to suit that opinion" then I think |
| 13 |
> we just disagree on that point. Don't make it out like we made the decision |
| 14 |
> without thinking of anonymous / pseudonymous contributors; numerous |
| 15 |
> discussions were had about them and we could not find a way to include them |
| 16 |
> in the policy. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> That doesn't mean we didn't hear their thoughts and objections though. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
And this. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Andreas K. Hüttel |
| 24 |
dilfridge@g.o |
| 25 |
Gentoo Linux developer |
| 26 |
(council, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice) |
Archives