| 1 |
Dnia 2015-09-30, o godz. 21:10:17 |
| 2 |
Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> napisał(a): |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> >>>>> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > 2. We deprecate <herd/> in metadata.xml and assign herds/teams/projects |
| 7 |
> > via e-mail addresses. This keeps partial backwards compatibility with |
| 8 |
> > existing tools and solves the bug assignment issue. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I'm pretty sure I've mentioned this before, but seems that you have |
| 11 |
> missed it. IMHO matching projects via their e-mail address is not a |
| 12 |
> good idea, because some projects have an address <project>-bugs@g.o or |
| 13 |
> dev-<project>@g.o which makes guessing the project's name (and finding |
| 14 |
> the project page) more difficult. Therefore, projects should be |
| 15 |
> matched by their proper name. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
And why would you need to guess that? Wiki project names are already |
| 18 |
disjoint from herds.xml <name/>s, so I don't see a problem with that. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> > 2a. If someone really cares about this, we add an extra attribute or |
| 21 |
> > element which indicates the 'kind' of <maintainer/>. Otherwise, we just |
| 22 |
> > match herds.xml by e-mail address. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Why don't we follow the KISS principle and replace <herd> by <project> |
| 25 |
> in metadata.xml? That is, create a project for every herd. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Because this: |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
1. breaks backwards compatibility, |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
2. doesn't change anything but the name which is the most meaningless, |
| 32 |
waste-of-time change you could have proposed. if you do this, please |
| 33 |
count me out. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
> Personally, I find this: |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> <project>portage</project> |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
> easier to read than this: |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
> <maintainer type="project"> |
| 42 |
> <email>dev-portage@g.o<email> |
| 43 |
> </maintainer> |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
-- |
| 46 |
Best regards, |
| 47 |
Michał Górny |
| 48 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/> |
Archives