1 |
On Sat, 2020-12-12 at 14:42 +0000, Roy Bamford wrote: |
2 |
> Now we have a council member appealing directly to council again ... |
3 |
> that sends the message to the community, yet again, that the |
4 |
> processes that council are supposed to enforce don't apply to |
5 |
> council |
6 |
> members. |
7 |
> Will the damage from that message ever be undone? |
8 |
|
9 |
Is this really a message sent 'by the event', or a deliberate FUD |
10 |
spread by people who don't like the message? Because when people start |
11 |
disputing the process and not the actual arguments, the message I get |
12 |
is 'they are right and we can't argue with that, so let's try to sweep |
13 |
it under the rug'. Then we get walls of meaningless text, arguments |
14 |
about the process, conflicts of interest, etc. |
15 |
|
16 |
-- |
17 |
Best regards, |
18 |
Michał Górny |