| 1 |
On 09/04/2018 18:56, Matthew Thode wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 18-04-09 10:23:53, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Am Montag, 9. April 2018, 02:11:19 CEST schrieb zlg: |
| 4 |
>>>> We request that the Gentoo Council and the Board of Trustees of the |
| 5 |
>>>> Gentoo |
| 6 |
>>>> Foundation affirm Gentoo's metastructure GLEP 39 as the governing |
| 7 |
>>>> principle |
| 8 |
>>>> of the Gentoo Linux developer community. In particular, both acknowledge |
| 9 |
>>>> the split between |
| 10 |
>>>> |
| 11 |
>>>> - the Gentoo Council, which is responsible for the Gentoo Linux |
| 12 |
>>>> developer |
| 13 |
>>>> |
| 14 |
>>>> community, its user base and all technical decisions, |
| 15 |
>>>> |
| 16 |
>>>> - and the Gentoo Foundation, whose role is to hold Gentoo's assets |
| 17 |
>>>> |
| 18 |
>>>> (such as trademarks and server infrastructure) and support the |
| 19 |
>>>> developer |
| 20 |
>>>> and user community. |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
>> [snip] |
| 23 |
>>> To the Council: |
| 24 |
>>> |
| 25 |
>>> What makes you accountable to this community? Why should we trust or |
| 26 |
>>> respect you when you have nothing on the line except a title? What |
| 27 |
>>> happens next if these affirmations are made? What's your angle, your |
| 28 |
>>> real motivation? |
| 29 |
>> |
| 30 |
>> |
| 31 |
>> This proposal describes precisely |
| 32 |
>> * how I was taught "Gentoo works" for my quizzes sometime around 2010 |
| 33 |
> You could have been taught wrong |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Well, I'm part of this community since pretty much the beginning, that |
| 36 |
was the idea when the whole metastructure got created. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
>> * how the cooperation and separation of responsibilities between council and |
| 39 |
>> foundation worked for the years since then |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
> Just means it's been disfunctional for years |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
Since nobody complained about it, I tend to disagree... |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
lu |
Archives