1 |
Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
>> Let's say I propose an idea that 80% of the council likes but 80% |
4 |
>> of developers want. This doesn't seem unreasonable since I was very |
5 |
>> highly ranked in voting with a platform that involves totally |
6 |
>> changing our leadership structure, and yet the council insists it |
7 |
>> cannot change GLEP 39. I would be pretty pissed if most of Gentoo |
8 |
>> wanted something but the "cabal" at the top didn't even let them |
9 |
>> make the choice. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> I've read this paragraph twice, but I still fail to understand it. |
12 |
> Why do you call it a "cabal" if there is a large majority both amongst |
13 |
> council members and devs in general? |
14 |
> |
15 |
I think it's a typo-- the first line should read: |
16 |
>> Let's say I propose an idea that 80% of the council _dislikes_ but 80% |
17 |
>> of developers want. |
18 |
-- |
19 |
#friendly-coders -- We're friendly, but we're not /that/ friendly ;-) |