| 1 |
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 04:56:34PM +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 08:47:37 -0500 William Hubbs wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Sun, Jul 09, 2017 at 06:56:25PM +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > Dear all, |
| 5 |
> > > |
| 6 |
> > > The new Gentoo Council will meet on Sunday, July 16th at 19:00 UTC |
| 7 |
> > > in #gentoo-council on FreeNode. |
| 8 |
> > > |
| 9 |
> > > Please reply to this message with any items you would like us to discuss |
| 10 |
> > > or vote on. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > Based on the on-going discussion about stabilization policies, I would |
| 13 |
> > like to ask the council to consider moving glep 40 to withdrawn status. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Do we have anything to replace it ready? I fully support that |
| 16 |
> stabilization policies needs to be updated, but if GLEP 40 will be |
| 17 |
> withdrawn without any replacement approved, we'll have no official |
| 18 |
> stabilization policies at all. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
glep 40 only targets x86 otherwise I would agree with you. It doesn't |
| 21 |
make sense to have a glep that targets only one architecture. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Thanks, |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
William |
Archives