Archives
Archives
| From: | Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Gentoo project list <gentoo-project@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-project] RFC: Dropping rsync as a tree distribution method | ||
| Date: | Sun, 16 Dec 2018 04:40:57 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAEdQ38H=7bFuYetYQde6e3YLfbc+2G_gNSBme6v3ekrPZVbE5g@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-project] RFC: Dropping rsync as a tree distribution method by Alec Warner |
||
| 1 | On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:16 PM Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > - Disk usage for git vs rsync |
| 3 | |
| 4 | This is why I have not switched. With git you pull down increasing |
| 5 | amounts of history, whereas with rsync the data fits easily in a <1GB |
| 6 | partition. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-project] RFC: Dropping rsync as a tree distribution method | Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@g.o> |