Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: George Prowse <cokehabit@×××××.com>
Cc: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@×××××××××××××.uk>, gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] PMS
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 01:17:25
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 00:58:15 +0000 > George Prowse <cokehabit@×××××.com> wrote: >> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >>> On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 21:18:08 +0100 >>> "Denis Dupeyron" <calchan@g.o> wrote: >>>> On Dec 15, 2007 5:48 PM, Ciaran McCreesh >>>> <ciaran.mccreesh@×××××××××××××.uk> wrote: >>>>> Incorrect. The Council has stated that once PMS has been accepted >>>>> [...] >>>> Which has yet to happen. >>> Well no. But that doesn't stop what Roy said from being utter >>> nonsense. >>> >> But which would hold more weight? > > Huh? >
ok, lets put it in easy language... If a package manager that Gentoo uses happens to use ebuilds, right? And the main developer of another package manager thinks that it shouldn't be used for that reason then it would be logical to never use that PM for PACKAGE MANAGEMENT. Right? Actually, that would give pretty much anything weight over said PM. -- gentoo-project@g.o mailing list