Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] changing the default of ACCEPT_LICENSE in portage
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:15:31
Message-Id: CAEdQ38Gtwh2b8nhg9OYWKY9gvNnA=4_cx-vLZ6DNygEt2LeGvg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] changing the default of ACCEPT_LICENSE in portage by hasufell
1 On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 8:28 AM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote:
2 > On 07/30/2013 05:08 PM, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
3 >> I don't see any conflict between requiring that our system packages be
4 >> free software and providing the pragmatic experience that we also
5 >> promise to our users in our philosophy:
6 >
7 > I don't see any conflict between requiring the user to accept unfree
8 > licenses explicitly and our philosophy.
9 > In fact, we are already forcing interaction with that variable via "-@EULA".
10
11 ... I think Donnie's agreeing with you.