Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2018-10-14
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2018 09:16:09
Message-Id: w6g7eimfbqq.fsf@kph.uni-mainz.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2018-10-14 by desultory
1 >>>>> On Sat, 13 Oct 2018, desultory wrote:
2 > On 10/11/18 13:35, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
3 >>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2018, Alec Warner wrote:
4
5 >>> My reading of ulm's proposal is that it is allowed.
6
7 >>> Ebuilds "shall" use the simple attribution, not that they "must" use it.
8
9 >>> To me that implies the simple attribution should be the default, but the
10 >>> complex attribution is acceptable in the ::gentoo repo.
11
12 >>> Maybe I'm misunderstanding the proposal?
13
14 >> No, you've understood it exactly how it was meant.
15
16 > Especially given the audience, "should" would convey that intent more
17 > clearly than "shall". [1]
18
19 > [1] https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt
20
21 | 3. SHOULD This word, or the adjective "RECOMMENDED", mean that there
22 | may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances to ignore a
23 | particular item, but the full implications must be understood and
24 | carefully weighed before choosing a different course.
25
26 LGTM, especially the part that the implications must be carefully
27 weighed before ignoring the policy.
28
29 Ulrich

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies