| 1 |
>>>>> On Sat, 08 Sep 2018, Andrew Savchenko wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Sat, 08 Sep 2018 15:35:58 +0200 Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 4 |
>> # Real names must be provided for all developers, including |
| 5 |
>> # infrastructure and documentation. Any exceptions to this for |
| 6 |
>> # extenuating circumstances will be considered on a case-by-case |
| 7 |
>> # basis. No exceptions will be made for people doing copyrightable |
| 8 |
>> # work (ebuilds, software, scripts, documentation, etc.). |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> Real names must be provided != must be publicly available. The |
| 11 |
> current status is that they are in LDAP, but not viewable outside |
| 12 |
> of recruiters (and maybe some other limited groups). |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
The list of active developers at |
| 15 |
https://www.gentoo.org/inside-gentoo/developers/ (which AFAIK is |
| 16 |
generated from LDAP) doesn't suggest any such cases. I see one name |
| 17 |
which seems to be a pseudonym (a name of a character from a comic), |
| 18 |
but that person is not an ebuild developer. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Please correct me if I'm wrong. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
> What you are proposing demands public availability, so it can be seen |
| 23 |
> as an extra requirement compared to GLEP. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Ulrich |
Archives