| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 15-08-2011 19:29, Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 5 |
> On 14.08.2011 19:12, Roy Bamford wrote: |
| 6 |
>> On 2011.08.14 15:39, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 7 |
>>> On 08/14/2011 03:19 PM, Roy Bamford wrote: |
| 8 |
>>>> Team, |
| 9 |
>>>> |
| 10 |
>>>> ... |
| 11 |
>> [snip] |
| 12 |
>>>> Why do devrel members need to be developers? Users with the |
| 13 |
>>>> correct skill set can do the job just as well, if they are |
| 14 |
>>>> interested. |
| 15 |
>>> devrel members are mainly recruiters, which requires ebuild and |
| 16 |
>>> organization knowledge. If a users has this knowledge it is not |
| 17 |
>>> hard to become a developer and join recruiters |
| 18 |
>> We are discussing devrel here, not recruiters. I was under the |
| 19 |
>> impression (perhaps mistakenly) that devrel and recruiters were |
| 20 |
>> two separate projects. If one has become a subset of the other by |
| 21 |
>> virtue of overlapping skill requirements and project membership |
| 22 |
>> maybe thats a pointer that the projects should be merged. While |
| 23 |
>> that's interesting, its not the topic of this thread. |
| 24 |
>> |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Recruiters are a sub project of devrel. I at some point suggested |
| 27 |
> the to my predecessors that recruiters could be separate but since I |
| 28 |
> have been the lead of both how both are organized hasn't been a |
| 29 |
> priority. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> Regards, Petteri |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Currently the DevRel team may be composed by people that are in either |
| 34 |
the Recruiters, the Undertakers or in both projects. That is not the |
| 35 |
same as saying that DevRel = Recruiters + Undertakers. |
| 36 |
For starters, joining Recruiters or Undertakers doesn't make you a |
| 37 |
DevRel member. Also, the reason we currently have the match is that all |
| 38 |
Recruiters and Undertakers have with time been asked to join DevRel, |
| 39 |
that the Ombudsman, later disputer resolutions team, was extinct and |
| 40 |
that other members not part of Recruiters or Undertakers have dropped |
| 41 |
the team. |
| 42 |
In my talks with Petteri about creating the Community Relations project, |
| 43 |
merging DevRel and UserRel, our plan was to create a dispute resolutions |
| 44 |
team again to make it clear that it is a distinct body from recruiters, |
| 45 |
undertakers and any other project under Community Relations. |
| 46 |
The important point here is that the skill set required for these are |
| 47 |
not necessarily the same. One might be a great Recruiter and not have |
| 48 |
the best mindset for being a dispute resolution member. |
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
- -- |
| 51 |
Regards, |
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org |
| 54 |
Gentoo- forums / Userrel / Devrel / KDE / Elections / RelEng |
| 55 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 56 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) |
| 57 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ |
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOTHE9AAoJEC8ZTXQF1qEPx6AQAJxa86qVQwYktvaT+CKMpBWK |
| 60 |
8rHQSgYsPY8/8jhfBPt4WDsIUt/0lskhbDmbx57CVEpGA1rNF8Fbm6TGDv9VUTkS |
| 61 |
SjWRvk3EIBRKKB43CN2SUQs8N79T/CBYreJLXz1Ont5mLRCQfSesGIVfnCHFZW+B |
| 62 |
ys34WUarA2ZJZZtpA7+60U2ZLXmrYipptL2eZmWrawLZHooedEcwO0bC6YrYoeM4 |
| 63 |
XOvyCp4bmZwPEBwbOpHzNXjMfNbwVrZOVYVVHXtRcOplRYjFvMLcDh1m6OwZ6IY4 |
| 64 |
V7urVU0+cZBDKfO4okWMSL/5sCXrV6JzG1IvUTh5yB0j/ZUTD16Ve7UB+XlPoLTA |
| 65 |
VVDGRvqJj4+pI1Fu4wVbv7sVWxMmA6m8qGzdSFVfFlpxKd/YNJKoXBYSKtaZQmfM |
| 66 |
uB5+DF/LLxxukpJU/6ljImSubvHUjDsIptrUgKozomfaAw556/IcVCh1o+zD0OlK |
| 67 |
aqueFHcl8p9YGqJ5UBpwTqGr9U57zyeVBWLc6mX70GKAFdM1a3m27Y9tgxXpi5bU |
| 68 |
c2w18VYdwk6MZFhdesftr6BdWP3laohFinWHlAhpdQzTUVagB65IsFs9oAk6d0TQ |
| 69 |
KJXYkQHACfDxJMZXe6Pu7eEchFgelEmnooaQZ2BH0EsPn+pcmpsQeGXosJa8LRM2 |
| 70 |
kIRoyfnsd+V2TlEBvpGu |
| 71 |
=BHAi |
| 72 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives