| 1 |
On Sunday 18 May 2008 16:26:00 William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 16:01 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 3 |
> > For the zillionth time... GLEP 39 was not a GLEP. It was one of a |
| 4 |
> > collection of proposals (that were not GLEPs) that were voted upon by a |
| 5 |
> > global vote. It was then *later* made available in GLEP form by Grant |
| 6 |
> > for convenience, but it wasn't accepted as a GLEP. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Ok, but where is it stated that changes, or amendments can only be |
| 9 |
> done/approved by a global vote? As it stands now, it clearly states |
| 10 |
> global issues are to be decided by the council. With no conditions or |
| 11 |
> stipulations. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
On Sunday 18 May 2008 17:38:14 William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: |
| 14 |
> Another very good point. IMHO the CoC falls under the GSC which the |
| 15 |
> trustees/foundation enforces not the council. So they topic at hand for |
| 16 |
> the current council is not of technical nature and thus should not be on |
| 17 |
> their plate. Which the subsequent meeting of a topic/subject that should |
| 18 |
> not fall to them. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
So is GLEP 39 within the Council's domain or not? It seems pretty |
| 21 |
non-technical to me, global issue or not. |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-project@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives