| 1 |
On Sun, 11 May 2014 19:52:07 +0200 |
| 2 |
Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Sun, 11 May 2014 19:18:27 +0200 |
| 5 |
> Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > Can you also consider that people are pushing QA too hard, or |
| 8 |
> > rubbing the QA team the wrong way? Action, reaction; there are two |
| 9 |
> > sides to it. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Sure. Everyone suffers. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
+1 |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> But as you [..] you have an obvious problem working in that setting. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Yes, hence the reply; such that we can solve this with the community. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> And to me it looks remarkably like you were throwing the book at |
| 20 |
> someone while assuming a "[QA]" role. It doesn't look like that's |
| 21 |
> working out too well. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Well, no, in this case the "documented in gentoo-core in 2007" book is |
| 24 |
thrown at QA; doesn't work too well, when we can't even read that book. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Remarkable that new developers are expected to have magically read it; |
| 27 |
the lack of knowledge codification is a problem, hence the policy needs |
| 28 |
an update instead of another tired "you must not have been here in 20XX" |
| 29 |
remark by a random developer with no quote or reference that helps out. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
With kind regards, |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
| 35 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
| 38 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
| 39 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |
Archives