| 1 |
>>>>> On Sun, 22 Mar 2015, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On 22 Mar 2015 09:21, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 4 |
>> It doesn't work like this in our case. The Portage tree is licensed |
| 5 |
>> under the GPL-2. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Sorry, this wasn't as precise as it should have been. I should have |
| 8 |
written "ebuilds in the Portage tree" here. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
>> If someone takes a subset of ebuilds from it, it will be a |
| 11 |
>> "derivative work" and it cannot be distributed under any license |
| 12 |
>> other than the GPL-2. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> no, content is licensed, not directories. you can't reasonably claim |
| 15 |
> that all the various files/ (like patches we grab from elsewhere) |
| 16 |
> are all under GPL-2- only. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Ulrich |
Archives