1 |
>>>>> On Sun, 27 Nov 2022, Robin H Johnson wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 07:20:32PM +0100, Ulrich Müller wrote: |
4 |
>> - * It may have one or many leads, and the leads are |
5 |
>> - selected by the members of the project. This selection must |
6 |
>> - occur at least once every 12 months, and may occur at any |
7 |
>> - time. |
8 |
>> + * It should have at least one lead, and the leads are selected by |
9 |
>> + the members of the project. This selection must occur at least |
10 |
>> + once every 12 months, and may occur at any time. |
11 |
|
12 |
> The subject line buries the lede here ;-). |
13 |
|
14 |
> If the GLEPs are trying to follow RFC 2119 language semantics. |
15 |
|
16 |
> "SHOULD" is "recommended" |
17 |
> "MAY" is "truly optional" |
18 |
|
19 |
I don't think they do. The last item in the list says: |
20 |
|
21 |
"... any single person *may* not be a proxy for more than one council |
22 |
member at any given meeting." (my emphasis) |
23 |
|
24 |
Obviously this isn't an optional "MAY" but a requirement. (And IMHO the |
25 |
meaning is clear, so no need to reword it.) |
26 |
|
27 |
> How about this, again in line with RFC 2119 (formatted for ease of discussion): |
28 |
> == |
29 |
> It is recommended that projects have at least one lead. |
30 |
> It is recommended that leads are selected by members of the project. |
31 |
|
32 |
This would imply that leads could also be selected by somebody else? |
33 |
|
34 |
> Lead selection may occur at any time. |
35 |
> Lead selection is required to occur least once every 12 months. |
36 |
> == |
37 |
|
38 |
Not sure. I have tried to do minimal changes, i.e. clarify things where |
39 |
it's necessary, but leave the rest of the wording alone. |
40 |
|
41 |
How about this then: |
42 |
|
43 |
| * It is recommended that a project has at least one lead. The leads |
44 |
| are selected by the members of the project. This selection must |
45 |
| occur at least once every 12 months, and may occur at any time. |
46 |
|
47 |
Ulrich |